This seemed the most appropriate working group to post this suggestion.
I would like to see a new Internet-Draft/RFC to add some well-known
scopes to the IANA registry to promote adoption of Oauth in Groupware
domains. I will try to write it myself, but have no experience with
I-Ds or as a te
would be
well-known scopes that could be implemented with well-defined semantics.
- Warren
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 8:12 PM Clinton Bunch wrote:
This seemed the most appropriate working group to post this
suggestion.
I would like to see a new Internet-Draft/RFC to add some well-k
ic vendor name would hamper
wide-spread adoption, so a namespace defined by a neutral party such as
IETF seemed best.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 8:46 PM Clinton Bunch wrote:
On 4/2/2023 1:34 PM, Warren Parad wrote:
I propose a set of nine well-known scopes
Can you elaborate
most common use cases would include both read and write, I
defined short-hand scopes that included both permissions.
If that doesn't answer your question, then I'm not sure what you're
looking for.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:37 PM Clinton Bunch wrote:
On 4/2/2023 2:26 P
n implementations and have them work for a wide set of users
without placing an undue burden on the user.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 9:57 PM Clinton Bunch wrote:
On 4/2/2023 2:49 PM, Warren Parad wrote:
But why these scopes?
Separate read and write scopes for the three pieces of a
can't think of a manageable way
to use scope to get more fine-grained than that. Perhaps defining a new
optional claim with the URI of the specific calendar could be added to
the request and the introspection response or JWT.
-DW
On Apr 2, 2023, at 12:12 PM, Clinton Bunch wrote:
this to calext or emailcore, but neither would be
appropriate for all these scopes and Oauth would need to approve the
IANA registration using this URI namespace. So I tried here first.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 11:24 PM Clinton Bunch wrote:
On 4/2/2023 4:06 PM, Warren Parad wrote:
Wh
mp;1 Mail & Media Development & Technology GmbH
*From: *OAuth on behalf of Warren Parad
*Date: *Monday, 3. April 2023 at 00:00
*To: *Clinton Bunch
*Cc: *"oauth@ietf.org"
*Subject: *Re: [OAUTH-WG] A proposal for a new Internet Draft
I think it would make sense if after CalDA
