[OAUTH-WG] Re: [IANA #1416058] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (jwt)

2025-04-10 Thread Michael Jones
My intuition is that we’re better off without that. If we call out that “…” is somehow different, it might trigger unanticipated objections. But thanks for the suggestion. -- Mike From: Brian Campbell Sent: Monday, April 7, 2025

[OAUTH-WG] Re: [IANA #1416058] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt (jwt)

2025-04-10 Thread Brian Campbell
That's a reasonable intuition. Will just leave it then. On Mon, Apr 7, 2025 at 11:55 AM Michael Jones wrote: > My intuition is that we’re better off without that. If we call out that > “…” is somehow different, it might trigger unanticipated objections. > > > > But thanks for the suggestion. >

[OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List

2025-04-10 Thread Steffen Schwalm
Hi Brian, thanks a lot for your mail. As far as I know informal meetings and assumptions of alleged consensus are no basement for trustworthy decisions on open standardization and official standardization bodies like IETF as the chairs confirmed several times. We are currently in WGLC, after co