[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7715)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7715 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alex Wi

[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7716)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6749, "The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7716 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Alex Wi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7715)

This errata should be rejected, as section 4.2.2.1 is about the implicit flow, which returns parameters in the fragment part of the URL, not query parameters. On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:51 AM RFC Errata System < rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted f

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-transaction-tokens-00.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-oauth-transaction-tokens-00.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol (OAUTH) WG of the IETF. Title: Transaction Tokens Authors: Atul Tulshibagwale George Fletcher Pieter Kasselman Name:draft-ietf-oaut

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7715)

Agree with Aaron that this errata should be rejected. On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 10:57 AM Aaron Parecki wrote: > This errata should be rejected, as section 4.2.2.1 is about the implicit > flow, which returns parameters in the fragment part of the URL, not query > parameters. > > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7716)

This errata should also be rejected for reasons similar to https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7715 - section 4.2.2 is about the implicit flow, which returns parameters in the fragment part of the URL, not query parameters. And that kind of consistency of hostname values in examples does not warra

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7715)

Hi Roman, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-e

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6749 (7716)

Hi Roman, We are unable to verify this erratum that the submitter marked as editorial. Please note that we have changed the “Type” of the following errata report to “Technical”. As Stream Approver, please review and set the Status and Type accordingly (see the definitions at https://www.rfc-e

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Digest, Vol 181, Issue 55

; Author(s) : D. Hardt, Ed. > >> Category: PROPOSED STANDARD > >> Source : Web Authorization Protocol > >> Area: Security > >> Stream : IETF > >> Verifying Party : IESG > >> > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Digest, Vol 181, Issue 56

ارجو منكم حذف وحضر yxz والعنواين الاخرى المشتبهة التي لاتنتمي الى معاملاتي في الأربعاء، ٢٩ نوفمبر ٢٠٢٣, ١١:٠٢ م كتب: > Send OAuth mailing list submissions to > oauth@ietf.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oau

[OAUTH-WG] ارجو منكم استعادة المال من هذا الهاكر لقد خدعني وارسل بريد عشوائي ملغوم برمز مميز ومن ثم استولى علا رموزات مميزة من حقي الخاص ارجو منكم حظرة من سحب الاموال وابلاغ منصة بيناناس في التحقيق مع

___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth