[OAUTH-WG] IPR Disclosure - OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice

Hi Daniel, Torsten, Andrey, as part of the shepherd write-up, all authors of must confirm that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have been filed. Here is the draft: draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-23 - OAuth 2.0 Secur

[OAUTH-WG] Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-oauth-security-topics-23

Hi all, here are some comments as part of my shepherd review of the OAuth Security BCP. First, I want to send a big "Thanks" to everyone in the group for the work on this document and to the authors in particular. It has taken us a while to come up with such an impressive list of security recom

[OAUTH-WG] Implementation Status of the "OAuth 2.0 Security BCP"

Hi all, as part of the shepherd write-up for the "OAuth 2.0 Security BCP" document, we are looking for information about implementations of this draft. Please let us know if there are implementations that follow the recommendations in the draft. I know that the document is a bit special due to t

Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR Disclosure - OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice

In my earlier email I forgot to include John. John, I also need your confirmation! Von: OAuth Im Auftrag von Tschofenig, Hannes Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. Oktober 2023 15:41 An: oauth@ietf.org Betreff: [OAUTH-WG] IPR Disclosure - OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice Hi Daniel, Torsten, Andrey,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR Disclosure - OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice

I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document. -Daniel Am 04.10.23 um 17:10 schrieb Tschofenig, Hannes: In my earlier email I forgot to include John. John, I also need your confirmation! *Von:*OAuth *Im Auftrag von *Tschofenig, Hannes *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 4. Oktober 2023 15:41 *A

Re: [OAUTH-WG] IPR Disclosure - OAuth 2.0 Security Best Current Practice

I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document. Am 4. Okt. 2023, 17:16 +0200 schrieb Daniel Fett : > I am not aware of any IPR associated with this document. > -Daniel > Am 04.10.23 um 17:10 schrieb Tschofenig, Hannes: > > In my earlier email I forgot to include John. > > > > John, I also

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Implementation Status of the "OAuth 2.0 Security BCP"

Hi, the yes open banking ecosystem was implemented based on the Security BCP. best regards, Torsten. Am 4. Okt. 2023, 16:46 +0200 schrieb Tschofenig, Hannes : > Hi all, > > as part of the shepherd write-up for the "OAuth 2.0 Security BCP" document, > we are looking for information about implemen