To my knowledge that spec doesn't exist. I'll let others chime in if
they have seen a proposal in that regard.
In regards to which working group, given the core topic is OAuth
authorization, I would present it here at a minimum.
Thanks,
George
On 1/22/23 7:06 AM, Markus PlusNet wrote:
Dear
I support adoption by the WG
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 8:51 AM Mike Jones wrote:
> Given that the draft is now being used, I support working group adoption.
>
>
>
> I’d also like to request time in Yokohama to talk about the draft.
>
>
>
>Tha
Thank you.
Regards
Markus
From: George Fletcher
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2023 1:43 PM
To: Markus; oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication
To my knowledge that spec doesn't exist. I'll let others chime in if they have
seen a proposal in that regard.
In rega
I support adoption by the working group.
-DW
> On Jan 24, 2023, at 2:38 AM, Giuseppe De Marco wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> I would like to bring to your attention this expired draft:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jones-oauth-resource-metadata/
>
> I propose the take up this ind
There is significant overlap between this draft and the concepts brought to
the OAuth WG at the last IETF meeting by Ben Schwartz, which he also
presented to the HTTPAPI WG. After that meeting, I volunteered to work with
Ben on adapting his concepts to a model that would fit better within the
OAuth
