Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-32: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer
While this is mostly covered in section 8.6 of RFC 8252 for native apps,
I wonder if we shouldn't mention "Client Impersonation" in this doc as
well in that any public client can be easily impersonated. Mobile OS's
are providing additional mechanisms for "authenticating" the client but
it's unc
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF.
Title : OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the
Application Layer (DPoP)
Authors : Daniel Fett
A new revision of DPoP has been published. The doc history snippet is
copied below. The main change here is the addition of an access token hash
claim.
-03
* Add an access token hash ("ath") claim to the DPoP proof when used
in conjunction with the presentation of an access token for
John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-32: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to http
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF.
Title : The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework: JWT Secured
Authorization Request (JAR)
Authors : Nat Saki
Thanks for your review, Lars. We've published
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-33 to address your and
other IESG comments.
Responses are inline below, prefixed by "Mike>".
-Original Message-
From: Lars Eggert via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 5:19 AM
To:
Thanks for your review, Éric. We've published
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-33 to address your and
other IESG comments.
Responses are inline below, prefixed by "Mike>".
-Original Message-
From: Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 7:49 AM
To:
Thanks for your review, Martin. We've published
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-33 to address your and
other IESG comments.
Responses are inline below, prefixed by "Mike>".
-Original Message-
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 12:13 PM
Thanks for your review, Francesca. We've published
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-33 to address your and
other IESG comments.
Responses are inline below, prefixed by "Mike>".
-Original Message-
From: Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 2
Thanks for your review, Ben. We've published
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-33 to address your and
other IESG comments.
Responses are inline below, prefixed by "Mike>".
-Original Message-
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
Sent: Tuesday, April
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please
Thank you Mike for your reply and your modifications.
Regards
-éric
-Original Message-
From: Mike Jones
Date: Thursday, 8 April 2021 at 06:44
To: Eric Vyncke , "i...@ietf.org"
Cc: "draft-ietf-oauth-jws...@ietf.org" ,
"oauth-cha...@ietf.org" , "oauth@ietf.org"
, "hannes.tschofe...@gm
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-33: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
14 matches
Mail list logo