Hello Thorsten,
Thank you for your response. I have a few more questions/comments as
follow-up...
You state that RFC7519 and RFC7662 "just" define different representations
for token data. If the draft RFC would refer to RFC 7515 (JWS), I would
agree. However, RFC7519 (JWT) explicitly adds semant
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8252,
"OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5848
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Bayard Bell
Secti
Process-wise I'm not sure if errata should be used to capture changing
implementation details like this. We expected the implementation details
that we documented in the appendix to change, and explicitly stated that
assumption. "The implementation details herein are considered accurate at
the time
