Le dim. 14 févr. 2016 02:40, William Denniss a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Mike Jones
> wrote:
>
>> It's an acceptable fallback option if the working group decides it
>> doesn't want to register the values that are already in production use at
>> the time we establish the registr
Hi Denniss,
out of curiosity: Does Google use amr values?
best regards,
Torsten.
Am 14.02.2016 um 02:40 schrieb William Denniss:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Mike Jones
mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
It's an acceptable fallback option if the working group decides it
I meant William - sorry!
Originalnachricht
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
Adoption Finalized
Von: Torsten Lodderstedt
An: William Denniss ,Mike Jones
Cc: ""
>Hi Denniss,
>
>out of curiosity: Does Google use amr values?
>
>best regar
In PoP Key Distribution, I’m trying to figure out the full set of expectations
that the client and AS will need to handle across different systems. From what
I gather, we’ve got at least these:
Client provides public key:
- Client stores keypair
- Server stores public key
Inline
> On Feb 14, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Justin Richer wrote:
>
> In PoP Key Distribution, I’m trying to figure out the full set of
> expectations that the client and AS will need to handle across different
> systems. From what I gather, we’ve got at least these:
>
>
> Client provides public key
