On 09/02/16 18:21, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
> Hi Vladimir
>
> Thanks for the response,
> On 09/02/16 16:09, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote:
>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> Yes, HTTP 400 is one way to handle a missing response_type with a
>> "universal" authz endpoint.
>>
> Indeed, looks like it makes sense
>> Or, y
Justin,
The abstract to 7033 says.
This specification defines the WebFinger protocol, which can be used
to discover information about people or other entities on the
Internet using standard HTTP methods. WebFinger discovers
information for a URI that might not be usable as a locator
Hi
I got it, thanks for clarifying the idea :-)
Thanks, Sergey
On 10/02/16 07:59, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote:
On 09/02/16 18:21, Sergey Beryozkin wrote:
Hi Vladimir
Thanks for the response,
On 09/02/16 16:09, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote:
Hi Sergey,
Yes, HTTP 400 is one way to handle a missing
This trick works for the response types that use the GET POST and fragment
encoded response modes.
In the future if we do a Java Script response mode as is being proposed that
might not always be the case.
Just a heads up.
Regards
John B.
> On Feb 10, 2016, at 7:09 AM, Sergey Beryozkin wrote
