Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question about RFC 7622 (Token Introspection)

2016-01-16 Thread Vladimir Dzhuvinov
On 15/01/16 15:47, Sergey Beryozkin wrote: > Hi John > > Thanks, looks like it was a last minute change because Introduction > does not explain why would clients want to use the introspection > endpoint to effectively 'unwrap' the opaque token representations. > > I have another question. How to

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Question about RFC 7622 (Token Introspection)

2016-01-16 Thread Justin Richer
All the values in the token introspection response are optional, except for “active”. If you don’t have anything to say about a particular aspect of the token, or can’t say it to the software that’s asking, then you generally leave it out of the response. — Justin > On Jan 16, 2016, at 11:02

[OAUTH-WG] Unsubscribe

2016-01-16 Thread Jason Harmon
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 14:00 wrote: > Send OAuth mailing list submissions to > oauth@ietf.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > oauth