Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 7009 OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation //proposed change wrt to "default" revocation of refresh tokens

2015-01-18 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Amit, as far as I understand you are asking for a documentation of guidelines for refresh token lifecycle management. Such guidlines are not in scope for RFC 7009, as it only wants to add a request to the AS to give the client an (interoperable) way to explicitly revoke tokens. Tokens lifecy

Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 7009 OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation //proposed change wrt to "default" revocation of refresh tokens

2015-01-18 Thread Amit Gupta
Hi Torsten, I get the point for a BCP around the revocation/validity of refresh tokens. I’ll compile a documents for what we thought should be the best practice around limiting the validity of refresh tokens (too many of these were unused, and keeping them alive was both a security liability, a

Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 7009 OAuth 2.0 Token Revocation //proposed change wrt to "default" revocation of refresh tokens

2015-01-18 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Amit, there are guidelines on format and process regarding Internet Drafts - see http://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/1id-guidelines.txt. You may submit an individual draft using the submission tool and mark it as relevant to the OAuth working group. To get an impression you may take a look at ht