Re: [OAUTH-WG] OX needs Dynamic Registration: please don't remove!

2013-08-13 Thread Phil Hunt
Dyn reg and the scim reg variant depend too much/biased towards passwords expressed as client secrets. A signed token approach has many advantages for service providers like not having to maintain a secure database of secrets/passwords. Finally issuing both a client secret and registration t

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OX needs Dynamic Registration: please don't remove!

2013-08-13 Thread Justin Richer
You can definitely issue or use other kinds of secrets with both dyn reg and the scim variant -- this was the reason we made a registry for the token_endpoint_auth_method at your (Phil's) request. Thing is, there weren't documents that described the authentication mechanisms that we could direc

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OX needs Dynamic Registration: please don't remove!

2013-08-13 Thread Phil Hunt
You missed both my points entirely. Phil On 2013-08-13, at 8:05, Justin Richer wrote: > You can definitely issue or use other kinds of secrets with both dyn reg and > the scim variant -- this was the reason we made a registry for the > token_endpoint_auth_method at your (Phil's) request. Thi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OX needs Dynamic Registration: please don't remove!

2013-08-13 Thread George Fletcher
Hi Phil, I'm sorry for not following completely. Some questions inline... On 8/13/13 11:00 AM, Phil Hunt wrote: Dyn reg and the scim reg variant depend too much/biased towards passwords expressed as client secrets. I'm not sure what you mean in regards to "client secrets". There are OAuth2 be