Re: [OAUTH-WG] Moving the User Experience Extension draft forward

David, any opinion on screen orientation and size? regards, Torsten. Am 27.07.2010 12:51, schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt: If I understand your proposal correctly, you assume the clients knows better than the authz server how to fit the client presentation capabilities the best. Wouldn't it be

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Moving the User Experience Extension draft forward

I guess my reply is similar to Marius. We haven't had a need for it yet in our production deployment. On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt < tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > David, > > any opinion on screen orientation and size? > > regards, > Torsten. > > Am 27.07.2010 12:51,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] comments/questions on draft 10

I think a bit more then just defining the delimiter is required in order to make things work as you described (in a interoperable way). 5.2.1 states "The "scope" attribute is a space-delimited list of scope values indicating the required scope of the access token for accessing the requested r

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Moving the User Experience Extension draft forward

So your login forms e.t.c. are the same for horicontal (e.g. iPad) and vertical (e.g. iPhone/normal operation) orientation? what posting of Marius do you refer to? regards, Torsten. Am 28.08.2010 20:20, schrieb David Recordon: I guess my reply is similar to Marius. We haven't had a need for i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Moving the User Experience Extension draft forward

+1 on making this a WG item Am 27.08.2010 22:23, schrieb David Recordon: Given our implementation experience, an iPad should use "popup" as it's a full web browser on a reasonably large screen. Android and the iPhone should use "touch". I'd be happy to add clarifying language in the extension

Re: [OAUTH-WG] comments/questions on draft 10

On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt < tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > I think a bit more then just defining the delimiter is required in order > to make things work as you described (in a interoperable way). > > 5.2.1 states "The "scope" attribute is a space-delimited list of

Re: [OAUTH-WG] comments/questions on draft 10

Am 28.08.2010 20:48, schrieb David Recordon: On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>> wrote: I think a bit more then just defining the delimiter is required in order to make things work as you described (in a interoperable way). 5.2.1

Re: [OAUTH-WG] survey: token revocation design options (intermediate result)

seams option 2 took the lead by one vote. 1a II 1b I 1c 2 III If no one objects by 08/29, I start writing the I-D based on option 2. regards, Torsten. Am 16.08.2010 23:09, schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt: Hi all, I intend to submit a I-D for token revocation. Based on previous discussions on t