Hello folks,
>A few questions we should answer before moving forward. Considering
*your* >use cases and reasons for being here:
>
>1. Why are you here? What are you trying to solve that is not already
>addressed by existing specifications (OAuth 1.0a, WRAP, etc)?
I am here because I support open
> A few questions we should answer before moving forward. Considering
> *your* use cases and reasons for being here:
>
> 1. Why are you here? What are you trying to solve that is not already
> addressed by existing specifications (OAuth 1.0a, WRAP, etc)?
I am here because delegation is really imp
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eran
Hammer-Lahav
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 9:14 AM
To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] WG Survey
A few questions we should answer before moving forward. Considering *your*
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> A few questions we should answer before moving forward. Considering *your*
> use cases and reasons for being here:
>
> 1. Why are you here? What are you trying to solve that is not already
> addressed by existing specifications (OAuth
On 2/18/10 10:14 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> A few questions we should answer before moving forward.
Eran, I think those were good questions. I've summarized the list
feedback so far below. I'm out of time for the moment, but will reply
with some of my own thoughts soon...
> Considering *your*
