Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology

2010-08-11 Thread Anthony Nadalin
/Espoo) Cc: OAuth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology Yes, there is Recommendation X.1252 (IdM terms) and then Y 2720 (NGN identity management framework) has some terms in addition to that. All documents in force are listed, and can be

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology

2010-08-11 Thread Igor Faynberg
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology Hannes, This is indeed a very good idea! ITU has been developing the IdM terminology for some time, so this document should prompt the discussion and -- let us hope!-- the alignment of normative

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology

2010-08-11 Thread Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
G > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and > Identity Management Terminology > > Hannes, > > This is indeed a very good idea! > > ITU has been developing the IdM terminology for some time, so this > document should prompt the discussion and -- let

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Feedback solicited for Privacy and Identity Management Terminology

2010-08-11 Thread Igor Faynberg
Hannes, This is indeed a very good idea! ITU has been developing the IdM terminology for some time, so this document should prompt the discussion and -- let us hope!-- the alignment of normative terminology. With thanks, Igor Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote: Hi all, Althought