the audience being
>>> part of the restrictions for "act as" or "on behalf of" support
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>>> Hannes Tschofenig
>&
.org] On Behalf Of
Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:41 AM
To: Phil Hunt
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Audience parameter in authorization flow
That's certainly true although the referenced document did not talk about the
registration phase but rather about the time when the
ent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:41 AM
> To: Phil Hunt
> Cc:
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Audience parameter in authorization flow
>
> That's certainly true although the referenced document did not talk about the
> registration phase but rather about the time when the cl
g [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Hannes Tschofenig
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 9:41 AM
To: Phil Hunt
Cc:
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Audience parameter in authorization flow
That's certainly true although the referenced document did not talk about the
registration phase but rathe
That's certainly true although the referenced document did not talk
about the registration phase but rather about the time when the client
talks to the authorization server to obtain an access token.
Maybe UMA has provided a story for this already...
On 08/21/2013 06:35 PM, Phil Hunt wrote:
T
This could be bound up in the client registration process since oauth clients
don't authorize for random "targets".
Phil
@independentid
www.independentid.com
phil.h...@oracle.com
On 2013-08-21, at 9:30 AM, "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)"
wrote:
> Hi Sergey,
>
> The idea of the
Hi Sergey,
The idea of the audience was to provide a way for the client to indicate the
resource server it wants to talk to explicitly rather than overloading the
scope field. We certainly need that capability for the MAC token work.
The audience information is provided when the client intera
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback,
On 19/08/13 17:09, Justin Richer wrote:
Both of those make sense to me, and it mimics what "scope" does today.
Namely, clients can usually register for a list of scopes that they want
access to, then at authorization time they ask for a particular set to
be approved