June 2020 03:47
> To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> Cc: Benjamin Kaduk; Dmitry Khlebnikov; n-sakim...@nri.co.jp; oauth; RFC
> Errata System
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7636 (6179)
>
> [External Email]
>
>
> As one of the author, writing from my perso
Nat, John,
Do you guys have any thoughts on this errata?
Regards,
Rifaat
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 4:25 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Authors, WG, any comments?
>
> Right now the likely dispositions seem to me to be Editorial/HFDU or
> Rejected; the text is noting that salting is not used and att
Authors, WG, any comments?
Right now the likely dispositions seem to me to be Editorial/HFDU or
Rejected; the text is noting that salting is not used and attempting to
give an explanation of why that's the right choice. It's not clear that
the WG was in error to include some such discussion at th
