Re: [OAUTH-WG] some WGLC comments on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-06

2015-11-06 Thread Brian Campbell
-- Mike > > > > *From:* OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Justin Richer > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 28, 2015 3:16 PM > *To:* Brian Campbell > *Cc:* > *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] some WGLC comments on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-06 > &g

Re: [OAUTH-WG] some WGLC comments on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-06

2015-10-28 Thread Mike Jones
: Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] some WGLC comments on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-06 The errata/update version of Connect’s registration spec need to register a bunch of stuff in the Dyn-Reg IANA registry, but I don’t think that’s been done yet. — Justin On Oct 27, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Brian Campbell

Re: [OAUTH-WG] some WGLC comments on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-06

2015-10-28 Thread Justin Richer
The errata/update version of Connect’s registration spec need to register a bunch of stuff in the Dyn-Reg IANA registry, but I don’t think that’s been done yet. — Justin > On Oct 27, 2015, at 3:41 PM, Brian Campbell > wrote: > > Sakimura-san, Senior Bradley, and distinguished members of the

[OAUTH-WG] some WGLC comments on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-06

2015-10-27 Thread Brian Campbell
Sakimura-san, Senior Bradley, and distinguished members of the OAUTH WG, I re-read draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq (-06 anyway, it'd been a while) for WGLC and, while I feel it's in pretty good shape, I did have a few comments on the draft. Those are listed below in roughly the order I came across things