Sure
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Dick Hardt wrote:
> And secevent?
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <
> rifaat.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sure, I will add that to the list.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Rifaat
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Brian Campbell <
>> bcamp
And secevent?
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> Sure, I will add that to the list.
>
> Regards,
> Rifaat
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Brian Campbell <
> bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we possibly also try and avoid conflicts with tokbind?
>>
>>
Sure, I will add that to the list.
Regards,
Rifaat
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Brian Campbell
wrote:
> Can we possibly also try and avoid conflicts with tokbind?
>
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:25 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <
> session-requ...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> A new
Can we possibly also try and avoid conflicts with tokbind?
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:25 AM, IETF Meeting Session Request Tool <
session-requ...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Rifaat
> Shekh-Yusef, a Chair of the oauth working group.
>
>
>
A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Rifaat Shekh-Yusef, a
Chair of the oauth working group.
-
Working Group Name: Web Authorization Protocol
Area Name: Security Area
Session Requester: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Number of Se