Re: [OAUTH-WG] minor issue with scope and RFC 6749 ABNF in sasl-oauth

2015-03-24 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi Torsten, On Tue, 24 Mar 2015, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote: > Hi Benjamin, > > in my opinion, your proposal sound reasonable from a protocol perspective. I should clarify that Bill came up with the idea; I just sent the mail. Thank you for reviewing it. -Ben __

Re: [OAUTH-WG] minor issue with scope and RFC 6749 ABNF in sasl-oauth

2015-03-23 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Hi Benjamin, in my opinion, your proposal sound reasonable from a protocol perspective. kind regards, Torsten. Am 23. März 2015 06:26:20 MEZ, schrieb Benjamin Kaduk : >Hi all, > >During the shepherd review for draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-19, I >noticed >an old comment from Matt back in Dec

Re: [OAUTH-WG] minor issue with scope and RFC 6749 ABNF in sasl-oauth

2015-03-23 Thread Jamie Nicolson
Gmail always returns a non-empty scope value in our error response, so the proposed protocol change would not affect our implementation. On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:26 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > Hi all, > > During the shepherd review for draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-19, I noticed > an old commen

[OAUTH-WG] minor issue with scope and RFC 6749 ABNF in sasl-oauth

2015-03-22 Thread Benjamin Kaduk
Hi all, During the shepherd review for draft-ietf-kitten-sasl-oauth-19, I noticed an old comment from Matt back in December 2013, in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten/current/msg04488.html . The relevant point here is that sending a scope of "" (the empty string) during the authorizatio