Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03

2013-03-07 Thread Todd W Lainhart
tleton, MA 01460-1250 1-978-899-4705 2-276-4705 (T/L) lainh...@us.ibm.com From: Justin Richer To: Todd W Lainhart/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS, Cc: IETF oauth WG Date: 03/07/2013 11:28 AM Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03 I hadn't set out to make the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03

2013-03-07 Thread Justin Richer
xington/IBM@IBMUS To: "IETF oauth WG" , Date: 03/07/2013 10:17 AM Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03 Sent by: oauth-boun...@ietf.org Hi Justin - I'm comparing: _ __http://tools.ietf.org/ht

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03

2013-03-07 Thread Todd W Lainhart
us.ibm.com From: Todd W Lainhart/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS To: "IETF oauth WG" , Date: 03/07/2013 10:17 AM Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03 Sent by:oauth-boun...@ietf.org Hi Justin - I'm comparing: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rich

[OAUTH-WG] draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03

2013-03-07 Thread Todd W Lainhart
Hi Justin - I'm comparing: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-richer-oauth-introspection-03 ...with: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-revocation-05 for symmetry. If that's appropriate, and if I use revocation as the baseline, I'm wondering why introspection supports GET in addition