Thanks for the feedback Prateek. I've tried to address some of you comments
and questions inline below.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Prateek Mishra
wrote:
> It would be helpful if the draft identified the various cases that are
> intended to be supported. For example,
> in draft-ietf-oauth-a
It would be helpful if the draft identified the various cases that are
intended to be supported. For example,
in draft-ietf-oauth-assertions-10, there is a helpful distinction made
between "Client acting on behalf of a user" vs.
"Client Action on behalf of an anonymous user" (vs. even more advanc
