Hi Adrian,
I agree with Brian that the proposed document directly relates to
ongoing work in the OAuth working group. Establishing a completely
different mechanism for supporting Single Page Apps other than what is
being proposed by the working group will lead to bifurcated
implementations an
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:09 PM Brian Campbell
wrote:
> Publishing an independent stream RFC that runs contrary to the BCP
> coming out of the WG does seem potentially harmful.
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:59 AM RFC ISE (Adrian Farrel)
> wrote:
>> I want to be sure that ... there is no percei
Hi Adrian,
I believe this work was presented briefly to the WG in London during IETF
101. As far as I can recall, the general reaction/thinking at that time was
that the WG really should be working on a document about OAuth and single
page applications (that may or may not include something like t
Hi Adrian,
This document is definitely in scope for the OAuth WG.
We are planning a series of virtual interim meetings after the coming IETF
conference, and we would be happy to schedule one of these meetings to
discuss this document.
Regards,
Rifaat
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 1:59 PM RFC ISE (Ad
Hi OAuth,
The authors of draft-ideskog-assisted-token [1] have approached me
requesting that the draft be published as an Informational RFC in the
Independent Submission Stream [2].
The draft extends the OAuth 2.0 framework to include an additional
authorization flow for single page applications
