Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-03-07 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote: > > I support publication. > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Rifaat Shekh-Yusef" > To: "oauth" > Sent: 2/21/2022 10:12:00 AM > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document > > All, > > Mike and Kristina ma

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-24 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
;> > Sent: 2/21/2022 10:12:00 AM > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document > >> All, >> >> Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great >> comments received during the initial WGLC. >> >> This is a se

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-24 Thread John Bradley
I support publication. -- Original Message -- From: "Rifaat Shekh-Yusef" To: "oauth" Sent: 2/21/2022 10:12:00 AM Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document All, Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great comments

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-23 Thread David Waite
> > > > > From: OAuth on behalf of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > > Date: Monday, February 21, 2022 at 08:13 > To: oauth > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document > > All, > > Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address al

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-23 Thread Tim Cappalli
Date: Monday, February 21, 2022 at 08:13 To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document All, Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great comments received during the initial WGLC. This is a second WG Last Call for this document to make sure that

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-23 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Yes, the link to -00 was by mistake. This second WGLC is for -01 version. Regards, Rifaat On Wednesday, February 23, 2022, Neil Madden wrote: > I also support publication of the new draft (the 01 revision, not the 00 > revision linked to in this WGLC! I assume that’s just a mistake). > > — Ne

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-23 Thread Neil Madden
I also support publication of the new draft (the 01 revision, not the 00 revision linked to in this WGLC! I assume that’s just a mistake). — Neil > On 23 Feb 2022, at 08:59, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote: > > +1 in support for publication. > > The Nimbus JWT lib was recently updated to match the 0

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-23 Thread Mike Jones
Very cool! Thanks for updating us on your implementation. -- Mike From: OAuth On Behalf Of Vladimir Dzhuvinov Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2022 12:59 AM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-23 Thread Vladimir Dzhuvinov
+1 in support for publication. The Nimbus JWT lib was recently updated to match the 01 spec with the hash alg in the URN. Vladimir Dzhuvinov On 21/02/2022 15:12, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: All, Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great comments received during th

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-22 Thread Kristina Yasuda
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Mike Jones Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 8:27 PM To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef ; oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document Note that the current draft of this specification is https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-01

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-21 Thread Mike Jones
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 5:12 AM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document All, Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great comments received during the initial WGLC. This is a second WG Last Call for this document to make sure

[OAUTH-WG] Second WGLC for JWK Thumbprint URI document

2022-02-21 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
All, Mike and Kristina made the necessary changes to address all the great comments received during the initial WGLC. This is a *second* WG Last Call for this document to make sure that the WG has a chance to review these changes: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-ur