onse?
> both are valid options
> > quote_type
> >
> > Best regards.
> >
> > From: OAuth on behalf of
> > "torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org"
> >
> > Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2023 at 10:19
> > To: "Jorge.OlivaFernandez=40san
n=40lodderstedt@dmarc.ietf.org"
,
"Jorge.OlivaFernandez=40santander.co...@dmarc.ietf.org"
, "Oliva Fernandez,
Jorge"
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" , Brian Campbell
, Kai Lehmann
Subject: [EXT]Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
CAUTION: This message is from an
.OlivaFernandez=40santander.co...@dmarc.ietf.org"
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" , Brian Campbell
, Kai Lehmann
Subject: [EXT]Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
CAUTION: This message is from an EXTERNAL sender – be vigilant, particularly
with links and attachments. If you suspect i
, Kai Lehmann
Subject: [EXT]Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
CAUTION: This message is from an EXTERNAL sender – be vigilant, particularly
with links and attachments. If you suspect it, report it immediately using the
phishing button.
Hi,
the difference between section
The client does not care about where the money
> > > is coming from as long as it is being transferred to the target account.
> > > However, the RS which is actually performing the transfer operation may
> > > need this.
> > >
> > > /Kai
> > &g
. June 2023 at 11:21
> *To: *Kai Lehmann , "Oliva Fernandez, Jorge" <
> jorge.olivafernan...@santander.co.uk>, "oauth@ietf.org"
> *Subject: *Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
>
>
>
> Hi Kai, and thanks for your response,
>
>
>
> On 2 Jun 2023, at 14:10, Oliva Fernandez, Jorge
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Reviewing the just releases RFC there are a couple of examples that seems
> incorrect or maybe I’m missing something, in section 9.1 and 9.2 appear a
> field “debtorAccount” outside the “authorization_details” object an
From: "Oliva Fernandez, Jorge"
Date: Monday, 12. June 2023 at 11:21
To: Kai Lehmann , "Oliva Fernandez, Jorge"
, "oauth@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
Hi Kai, and thanks for your response,
The thing is that in section 9.1
Authorization Details in Token Response” in example of
Figure 17?
Best regards.
From: OAuth on behalf of Kai Lehmann
Date: Monday, 12 June 2023 at 09:22
To: "Oliva Fernandez, Jorge"
, "oauth@ietf.org"
Subject: [EXT]Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
CAUT
money is transferred TO and of course the amount of the
transferred money.
Best,
Kai
From: OAuth on behalf of "Oliva Fernandez, Jorge"
Date: Monday, 12. June 2023 at 10:08
To: "oauth@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
Hi,
Any commen
Hi,
Any comment about this? Thanks!
Best regards.
From: "Oliva Fernandez, Jorge"
Date: Friday, 2 June 2023 at 14:10
To: "oauth@ietf.org"
Subject: RFC 9396 - RAR doubt about examples
Hi,
Reviewing the just releases RFC there are a couple of examples that seems
incorrect or maybe I’m missing
Hi,
Reviewing the just releases RFC there are a couple of examples that seems
incorrect or maybe I’m missing something, in section 9.1 and 9.2 appear a field
“debtorAccount” outside the “authorization_details” object and in section 9.1
specify:
“debtorAccount:
API-specific field containing the
12 matches
Mail list logo
