Thanks Eran,
Best regards,
Diogo Almeida
On Jul 6, 2010, at 3:03 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 3, 2010, at 7:50, Diogo Almeida wrote:
>
>> Good afternoon,
>>
>> I would like to ask the WG two questions regarding -09
>>
>> 1)
>> On section 3.1, regarding the scope paramete
On Jul 3, 2010, at 7:50, Diogo Almeida wrote:
> Good afternoon,
>
> I would like to ask the WG two questions regarding -09
>
> 1)
> On section 3.1, regarding the scope parameter, it reads:
>
> code
> REQUIRED if the response type is "token" or "code-and-token", otherwise MUST
> NOT be inc
Sorry to repost this mail to the WG. However, we're still looking for feedback
on these two issues for our provider implementation.
PS: There was a typo in my first question. Where it reads: "On section 3.1,
regarding the scope parameter" it should read: "On section 3.1, regarding the
code para
Good afternoon,
I would like to ask the WG two questions regarding -09
1)
On section 3.1, regarding the scope parameter, it reads:
code
REQUIRED if the response type is "token" or "code-and-token", otherwise MUST
NOT be included. The authorization code generated by the authorization server.
Th
