Bravo! This has been project-managed masterly.
Igor
On 8/24/2011 8:32 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
I intend to add the following to the response to this item:
"The working group understands that client code needs to know whether
to use and decode
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> I intend to add the following to the response to this item:
> "The working group understands that client code needs to know whether
> to use and decode percent-encoding. The issue is being discussed and
> tracked, and will be resolved before t
> +1 for Jame's feedback here. We need to solve this.
I have opened an issue in the tracker on this:
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/ticket/26
I intend to add the following to the response to this item:
"The working group understands that client code needs to know whether
to use and dec
+1 for Jame's feedback here. We need to solve this.
From: "Manger, James H"
To: Barry Leiba ; "oauth@ietf.org"
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OMA Liaison Has Arrived! scope-v
>> * For beare
The text for the answer below came from Mike, as the chairs asked for
at the IETF 81 meeting. Mike, do you have a response to James's
issue? Can we give a better response here? Should the bearer doc
specify %-encoding explicitly?
Barry
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Manger, James H
wrote:
>
>> *For bearer tokens: clarification whether the non-support of percent
encoding for scope-v element of WWW-Authenticate Response Header Field
grammar is intentional.
> Answer:
> In the bearer token document (Section 2.4 of
> draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-08, "The WWW-Authenticate Response Header
+1
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Barry Leiba [mailto:barryle...@computer.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. August 2011 22:35
An: oauth@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OMA Liaison Has Arrived!
I'm sorry for the delay in getting this written. Because of the
delay, the working group has
Barry,
I personally think that this is both a very thorough and very timely
follow-up.
(You may consider a minor editorial: "As this writing" in the first
answer, should be "As of this writing." Could not catch anything else.
The only other suggestion is that maybe the response could omit
I'm sorry for the delay in getting this written. Because of the
delay, the working group has just a short time to review my proposed
response, below. Everyone, please have a look at the answers I
propose to send, and post any objections to this thread by the end of
the day on Monday, 22 August.
That's correct. Murray is the liaison and he will provide the response of the
liaison to the OMA.
I am the liaison shepherd from the Internet Architecture Board.
On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:41 AM, SM wrote:
> Hi Igor,
> At 10:39 PM 7/20/2011, Igor Faynberg wrote:
>> the communication can emanate dir
Hi Igor,
At 10:39 PM 7/20/2011, Igor Faynberg wrote:
the communication can emanate directly from them or IAB can
appoint a liaison to OMA, who will convey future
communications. But this is a procedural matter, and I am sure it
Murray Kucherawy was appointed as liaison to the Open Mobile Al
Friends,
I have intentionally used this thread, on which 1001 messages ago I
mentioned the OMA and ITU-T work. Since then I got several private
queries, and I am happy to say that the liaison from OMA has arrived
(although it has a little glitch, which made me write this otherwise
redundant m
12 matches
Mail list logo
