How to generate the correct oauth_signature in apex.Here is the code for
generating oauth_nonce, oauth_timestamp and oauth_signature. But not
getting the correct oauth_signature
// Generate a unique combination of numbers and alphabets for oauth-nonce
String nonce = String.valueOf(Crypto.getRandom
-- Mike
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David
Recordon
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:24 AM
To: Anthony Nadalin
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
Mike and Yaron's proposal is different from Nat's though. N
plementers to follow. But for now I think it gives a
> good sense of the some of the security challenges in creating a secure token
> format.
>
> Yaron
>
>
>
> *From:* oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Nat Sakimura
> *S
: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:13 AM
To: David Recordon
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
I'm just as confused :-) I think what happened is that I posted a signature
draft and then didn't follow up. Nat then very kindly agreed to help and put
out a draft, but
looks more like English and is
>> easier for actual implementers to follow. But for now I think it gives a
>> good sense of the some of the security challenges in creating a secure token
>> format.
>>
>> Yaron
>>
>>
>>
>> *From
The goal is to have a single unified draft.
From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 7:00 AM
To: Nat Sakimura; Yaron Goland
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
I'm a bit confused between the relationship of Nat's I
Yaron
>
>
>
> *From:* oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Nat Sakimura
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:50 AM
> *To:* oauth
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
>
>
>
> Hi.
>
>
>
> It ha
a secure token format.
>>
>> Yaron
>>
>>
>>
>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Nat Sakimura
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:50 AM
>> To: oauth
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Sig
Might actually want both @ same time, so might be better to expand
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of hdknr
hidelafoglia
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 12:39 PM
To: Yaron Goland
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:50 AM
> To: oauth
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature Draft Pre 00
>
>
>
> Hi.
>
>
>
> It has been a few weeks since then I volunteered to do this work.
>
> I have written up to this pre 00 draft then have been doing some rea
Hi.
It has been a few weeks since then I volunteered to do this work.
I have written up to this pre 00 draft then have been doing some reality
checks on some script languages etc.
No. This pre-00 draft is far from being feature complete.
I still need to copy and paste the Magic Signatures text et
ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Dirk Balfanz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 4:04 PM
> To: Nat Sakimura
> Cc: oauth
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
> On
ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Dirk Balfanz
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 4:04 PM
> To: Nat Sakimura
> Cc: oauth
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
> On
Is someone going to turn this into an I-D anytime soon?
EHL
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dirk
Balfanz
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2010 4:04 PM
To: Nat Sakimura
Cc: oauth
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth Signature
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Nat
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Dirk Balfanz wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Nat Sakimura
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a fundamental question.
> >>
> >> While separating signature and payload by a dot "." seems ok,
> >> I
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Dirk Balfanz wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>>
>> I have a fundamental question.
>>
>> While separating signature and payload by a dot "." seems ok,
>> I still have not the answer for the question "why not make everything
>> int
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:43 AM, Dick Hardt wrote:
>
>
> On 2010-07-27, at 12:34 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
>> I have a fundamental question.
>>
>> While separating signature and payload by a dot "." seems ok,
>> I still have not the answer for the question "why not make everything
>> into JSON and
On 2010-07-27, at 12:34 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
> I have a fundamental question.
>
> While separating signature and payload by a dot "." seems ok,
> I still have not the answer for the question "why not make everything
> into JSON and base64url it?".
bloat from base64 encoding twice
>
> BTW,
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
> I have a fundamental question.
>
> While separating signature and payload by a dot "." seems ok,
> I still have not the answer for the question "why not make everything
> into JSON and base64url it?".
>
> i.e., Right now, you are proposing:
I have a fundamental question.
While separating signature and payload by a dot "." seems ok,
I still have not the answer for the question "why not make everything
into JSON and base64url it?".
i.e., Right now, you are proposing:
base64url_encode(JSON(payload,envelope)).base64url_encode(signature
20 matches
Mail list logo
