On 7/21/10 11:58 AM, David Recordon wrote:
> What is the rechartering discussion?
Our charter says we're working on OAuth 1.1. Clearly that is not the
case. Aligning the charter with reality might be a good idea. :)
Peter
--
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/
__
What is the rechartering discussion?
Thanks,
--David
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Hannes Tschofenig <
hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please find the latest agenda at:
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/agenda/oauth.txt
>
> Make sure that you read to provide input during t
Hi all,
please find the latest agenda at:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/78/agenda/oauth.txt
Make sure that you read to provide input during the meeting:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-v2/
Ciao
Hannes & Blaine
___
OAuth mailing lis
While I will not be able to join the upcoming OAuth meeting in Maastricht, I
would like to see the following output from the meeting:
- Complete review of the -10 draft (to be published next week ahead of the
meeting), similar to that of -05 from the interim meeting.
- Discussion of internationa
..@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:35 PM
> To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth meeting notes on -05 (with updates)
>
> During the OAuth WG interim meeting, the group spent a considerable
> amo
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 9:48 AM
> To: Eran Hammer-Lahav; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth meeting notes on -05 (with updates)
>
> Recordon had a fantastic idea at the interim meeting, using G Wave for
> comments on the draft, which would have been far superior
> -Original Message-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org]
> On Behalf Of Eran Hammer-Lahav
> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:35 PM
> To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth meeting notes on -05 (with updates)
>
> During the OAuth
ok, understood.
Am 15.06.2010 um 09:16 schrieb Eran Hammer-Lahav :
How they communicate is out of scope.
EHL
From: Torsten Lodderstedt [mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:57 PM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth
How they communicate is out of scope.
EHL
From: Torsten Lodderstedt [mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net]
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 11:57 PM
To: Eran Hammer-Lahav
Cc: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth meeting notes on -05 (with updates)
- Explain that the separation between
- Explain that the separation between the authorization server and
resource server is out of scope
Why is this out of scope? I consider this a major improvement over
Oauth 1.0.
regards,
Torsten.
Am 15.06.2010 um 08:35 schrieb Eran Hammer-Lahav :
- Explain that the separation between th
During the OAuth WG interim meeting, the group spent a considerable amount of
time going over draft -05 and listing issues with the text and protocol. Since
the draft is now significantly different, I want to go over this and identify
the issues resolved and those still open (before it is too la
11 matches
Mail list logo
