On 2012-04-23 23:19, Eran Hammer wrote:
During the IESG review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2, Sean Turner raised the
following DISCUSS item (meaning, the specification is blocked until this
is resolved):
> 0) General: I found the lack of ABNF somewhat disconcerting in that
> implementers would have
org>
[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org]<mailto:[mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org]> On
Behalf Of Eran Hammer
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 2:20 PM
To: oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> WG
(oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>)
Subject: [SPAM] [OAUTH-WG] OAuth ABNF
Importance: Low
D
During the IESG review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2, Sean Turner raised the following
DISCUSS item (meaning, the specification is blocked until this is resolved):
> 0) General: I found the lack of ABNF somewhat disconcerting in that
> implementers would have to hunt through the spec to figure out al
