subject:"\[OAUTH\-WG\] OAuth 1.0 2\-legged scenario"

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0 2-legged scenario

2011-05-02 Thread Brian Eaton

Hey Andrew - Two-legged OAuth is a very confusing term. I've tried to stop using it, because it means so many different things to different people. I'm not 100% sure what your use case is... The current OAuth2 draft handles traditional client-server authentication with the client credentials fl

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0 2-legged scenario

2011-04-30 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav

address it. EHL From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Arnott Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 8:50 PM To: OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org) Subject: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0 2-legged scenario Does this doc<http://oauth.googlecode.com/svn/spec/ext/consumer_request

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 1.0 2-legged scenario

2011-04-30 Thread Andrew Arnott

Does this docaccurately describe what the community generally refers to as "two-legged OAuth"? If so, I have a couple questions... What about this is "*two* legged"? I count zero legs. The consumer already has a