> Just a couple points of clarification
Yes, thanks, Brian, for correcting the stuff I mischaracterized, in
writing my note too quickly.
Barry
___
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
age-
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Brian Campbell
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:11 PM
> To: Barry Leiba
> Cc: OAuth WG
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Barry
a -00 doc.
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Campbell
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 2:11 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
On Thu
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
>
> This document is intended to replace the SAML and Bearer Token
> documents, and those two will then be "profiles", defining specific
> assertion mechanisms.
Just a couple points of clarification
This doc is not related to the Bearer Token d
Chuck Mortimore wrote:
> A number of us in the community have been working on a general model
> for the use of Assertions in OAuth2 for both client authentication, as well
> as authorization grants. We’ve reached general consensus on a doc
> that I’ve published as a draft
This document is intende
egation case.
>
> More questions later.
>
> Thanks.
>
> /thomas/
>
>
> __________
> > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Chuck Mortimore
> > Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 3:42 PM
> > To: oauth@i
Thanks.
/thomas/
__
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Chuck Mortimore
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 3:42 PM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
>
> A number of us in th
: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
Thanks Chuck. Adding context, this document moves the common parts of the SAML
Profile<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-04> and
the JWT
Profile<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer-00>
ion case.
More questions later.
Thanks.
/thomas/
__
> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Chuck Mortimore
> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 3:42 PM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft fo
PM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] New Assertion Draft for review
A number of us in the community have been working on a general model for the
use of Assertions in OAuth2 for both client authentication, as well as
authorization grants. We've reached general consensus on a doc that I&#
A number of us in the community have been working on a general model for the
use of Assertions in OAuth2 for both client authentication, as well as
authorization grants. We've reached general consensus on a doc that I've
published as a draft:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mortimore-oauth-assert
11 matches
Mail list logo
