Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-10

2013-06-03 Thread Derek Atkins
Justin Richer writes: > I think the concern here is that rotation of client credential is not > something discussed before. Before we put it in the spec we should > consider the reasons for doing it and what problems it solves. > > The client doesn't get to choose when its credentials

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-10

2013-05-15 Thread Richer, Justin P.
I think that's exactly the case, which is why it's such valuable feedback. It's obvious to me, as the editor, what all the parts do. What I was hoping to do with the explanations below was ferret out what key bit of information was missing from which part of the spec, so that we can make things

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-10

2013-05-15 Thread Phil Hunt
Justin, I will look over your comments. But looking at some, i was not looking for an explanation but rather I think the text should explain. For example the registration access token seemed very mysterious. It took a lot of effort to understand what was going on. Maybe i am seeing this as

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-10

2013-05-15 Thread Richer, Justin P.
Phil, many thanks for the extremely thorough review! It is very useful indeed. My comments and responses to each point are inline. On May 15, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Phil Hunt mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com>> wrote: It seems unfortunate that I have not gotten a chance to get into this level of detail m

[OAUTH-WG] Last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-10

2013-05-15 Thread Phil Hunt
It seems unfortunate that I have not gotten a chance to get into this level of detail much earlier. But then, I guess that's what LC review is for! My apologies for not getting many of these concerns to the WG much earlier. Overall --- I think dynamic registration is a critical part of