s up with
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> --
> From: Brian Campbell
> Sent: 3/25/2015 2:19 PM
> To: Mike Jones
> Cc: oauth
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Destination Claim
>
> FWIW, I did have that as an open issue in the draft:
> ht
mailto:bcampb...@pingidentity.com>
Sent: 3/25/2015 2:19 PM
To: Mike Jones<mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
Cc: oauth<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Destination Claim
FWIW, I did have that as an open issue in the draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell
March 25, 2015 2:08 PM
> *To:* oauth
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] JWT Destination Claim
>
>
>
> Here are the slides that I rushed though at the end of the Dallas meeting:
>
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-oauth-1.pdf
>
>
>
> And the -00 draft:
> h
:08 PM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] JWT Destination Claim
Here are the slides that I rushed though at the end of the Dallas meeting:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-oauth-1.pdf
And the -00 draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-dst4jwt-00
In an informal
Here are the slides that I rushed though at the end of the Dallas meeting:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-oauth-1.pdf
And the -00 draft:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-campbell-oauth-dst4jwt-00
In an informal discussion earlier this week John B. suggested that some
additio
