com <mailto:mscurte...@google.com>>]
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:39 AM
>> > To: Paul Lindner
>>> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org
<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
>><mailto:oauth@ietf.org <mailto:
> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurte...@google.com
> >><mailto:mscurte...@google.com>]
> >>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:39 AM
> >>> To: Paul Lindner
> >>> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.or
@google.com>]
>> > Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:39 AM
>> > To: Paul Lindner
>> > Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org
>> <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>)
>> > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Identifying OAuth 2.0 vs 1.0 requests
>> >
>&
ahav; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org
<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>)
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Identifying OAuth 2.0 vs 1.0 requests
>
> I run into the same issue. In section "4.2. URI Query
Parameter", it would
> help if the parameter name, oauth_token, was diffe
9 AM
> > To: Paul Lindner
> > Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Identifying OAuth 2.0 vs 1.0 requests
> >
> > I run into the same issue. In section "4.2. URI Query Parameter", it
> would
> > help if the parame
t;
> Marius
>
> >
> > EHL
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurte...@google.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:39 AM
> >> To: Paul Lindner
> >> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG (oau
t;> From: Marius Scurtescu [mailto:mscurte...@google.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:39 AM
>> To: Paul Lindner
>> Cc: Eran Hammer-Lahav; OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Identifying OAuth 2.0 vs 1.0 requests
>>
>> I run into the same issu
f.org)
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Identifying OAuth 2.0 vs 1.0 requests
>
> I run into the same issue. In section "4.2. URI Query Parameter", it would
> help if the parameter name, oauth_token, was different from OAuth 1.
>
> Marius
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010
e authorization
>> server, why would you use the same endpoint?
>>
>>
>>
>> EHL
>>
>>
>>
>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Paul Lindner
>> Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:24 AM
>>
the authorization
> server, why would you use the same endpoint?
>
>
>
> EHL
>
>
>
> *From:* oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Paul Lindner
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2010 8:24 AM
> *To:* OAuth WG (oauth@ietf.org)
> *S
-WG] Identifying OAuth 2.0 vs 1.0 requests
Hi,
As I've been working through our oauth2 implementation I've noticed that it's
not easy to disambiguate OAuth 1.0a vs 2.0 API calls based on the request
parameters alone. Based on some investigative at the Shindig project it
appear
Hi,
As I've been working through our oauth2 implementation I've noticed that
it's not easy to disambiguate OAuth 1.0a vs 2.0 API calls based on the
request parameters alone. Based on some investigative at the Shindig
project it appears that the only standard way to to determine 1.0a vs 2.0 is
by
12 matches
Mail list logo
