t has no semantic meaning?
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav [mailto:e...@hueniverse.com]
Sent: 07 April 2010 11:46
To: Greg Beech; OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error in example in section 3.4.1.1 of
draft-hammer-oauth-10
While odd, this is a perfectly legal GET request with a form-encoded body.
EHL
g
that we should consider the form body even when it has no semantic meaning?
From: Eran Hammer-Lahav [mailto:e...@hueniverse.com]
Sent: 07 April 2010 11:46
To: Greg Beech; OAuth WG
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error in example in section 3.4.1.1 of
draft-hammer-oauth-10
While odd, this is a perfe
While odd, this is a perfectly legal GET request with a form-encoded body.
EHL
On 4/7/10 3:33 AM, "Greg Beech" wrote:
Hi
I noticed that there is an error in the example for section 3.4.1.1 in
the latest OAuth draft. The example of building a signature base string
uses the following request as
Hi
I noticed that there is an error in the example for section 3.4.1.1 in
the latest OAuth draft. The example of building a signature base string
uses the following request as an example (note the extraneous query
parameters at the bottom):
GET /request?b5=%3D%253D&a3=a&c%40=&a2=r%20b HTTP/1
