Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-15 Thread Mike Jones
[mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 11:27 AM To: Mike Jones Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion Hi Mike, thanks for raising this issue. I am fine with the currently proposed approach. I just had a personal preference for separate

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-15 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
low the > existing structure of the OAuth Errors registry to remain. > > Thank you, > -- Mike > > -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 20

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-14 Thread Eran Hammer
:00 PM To: Eran Hammer; William Mills; Hannes Tschofenig Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion Yes, we already have multiple registries, but only one for errors. When an error code can be used in more than one usage location, having one will make the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-14 Thread Mike Jones
me that having one is more convenient and simpler than having four. -- Mike From: Eran Hammer Sent: 6/14/2012 2:53 PM To: William Mills; Mike Jones; Hannes Tschofenig Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG Subject: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion We already have

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-14 Thread Eran Hammer
Behalf > Of William Mills > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:48 PM > To: Mike Jones; Hannes Tschofenig > Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion > > We might be able to combine these, but to me it really does make sense to > have one registry

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-14 Thread William Mills
2012 2:40 PM > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion > > Hi Hannes, > > You stated a preference for separate registries below, but that was a larger > change to the OAuth Core spec than the current draft, which added a fourth > error > usage location "r

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-06-14 Thread Mike Jones
s registry to remain. Thank you, -- Mike -Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:27 PM To: oauth@ietf.org WG Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusi

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-05-15 Thread Eran Hammer
; -Original Message- > From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Hannes Tschofenig > Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 2:27 PM > To: oauth@ietf.org WG > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion > > Hi all, > > on May 8th we c

[OAUTH-WG] Error Registry: Conclusion

2012-05-15 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, on May 8th we called for consensus on an open issue regarding the location of the error registry. Here is the call for comments: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg08952.html. Thank you all for the feedback. The consensus is to create the registry in the core docum