Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-07 Thread Paul Madsen
y, 7 April 2011 1:15 AM *To:* Eran Hammer-Lahav *Cc:* oauth@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials Proposed text The OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of an end-user by orche

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-06 Thread Manger, James H
uth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Madsen Sent: Thursday, 7 April 2011 1:15 AM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials Proposed text The OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol enables a third-party application to obtain

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-06 Thread Paul Madsen
g [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul Madsen *Sent:* Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:00 AM *To:* oauth@ietf.org *Subject:* Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials Can we not acknowledge in the abstract that there are other applications for OAuth beyond the delegated authz scenario? I tell pe

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-06 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Done. EHL Ps. I like 1974. From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Manger, James H Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 5:51 PM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials A few, mainly editorial, points on the latest OAuth 2.0 core draft [draft-ietf

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-06 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
Can you propose text? EHL From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Madsen Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:00 AM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials Can we not acknowledge in the abstract that there are other applications for

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-06 Thread Paul Madsen
th@ietf.org *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials A few, mainly editorial, points on the latest OAuth 2.0 core draft [draft-ietf-oauth-v2-15]: *Abstract*: Currently it is: The OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol enables granting third-party applications limited access to HTTP service on b

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-05 Thread Mike Jones
uth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials A few, mainly editorial, points on the latest OAuth 2.0 core draft [draft-ietf-oauth-v2-15]: Abstract: Currently it is: The OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol enables granting third-party applications limited access to HTTP service on behalf

[OAUTH-WG] draft-15 editorials

2011-04-05 Thread Manger, James H
A few, mainly editorial, points on the latest OAuth 2.0 core draft [draft-ietf-oauth-v2-15]: Abstract: Currently it is: The OAuth 2.0 authorization protocol enables granting third-party applications limited access to HTTP service on behalf of an end-user by orchestrating an approval

[OAUTH-WG] Draft -15

2011-04-05 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
I submitted a new draft (well two, I forgot one change in -14). Open issues are marked with [[ Pending Consensus ]] are considered unsafe to implement. Changes: * Many minor editorial changes. * Expanded abstract. * Added note to intro about this being an HTTP-specific protocol. * Additional ref