Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-08-11 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
All, Based on the responses to this call for adoption, we declare the *Attestation-Based Client Authentication* draft adopted as a WG document. Authors, Feel free to submit a WG document at your convenience. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes On Tue, Aug 8, 2023 at 11:51 AM Paul Bastian wrote: >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-08-08 Thread Paul Bastian
Being the co-author of this draft, I support adoption of Attestation-Based Client Authentication :) ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-08-02 Thread Jaimandeep Singh
+ PKCE + DPoP - basic auth Regards Jaimandeep Singh On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 7:44 PM Pieter Kasselman wrote: > I support adoption. > > > > *From:* OAuth *On Behalf Of *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > *Sent:* Saturday, July 29, 2023 8:27 PM > *To:* oauth > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call fo

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-08-01 Thread Michael Jones
I support adoption. From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 12:27 PM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication All, This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation-Based Client Authentication draft

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-31 Thread Daniel Fett
I support adoption. Am 29.07.23 um 21:27 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef: All, This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client Authentication *draft discussed in SF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/ Please, reply on the mai

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-30 Thread torsten=40lodderstedt . net
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 8:27 PM > > > To: oauth > > > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client > > > Authentication > > > > > > All, > > > > > > This is an official call for adoption for the Attestatio

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-30 Thread Orie Steele
I support adoption On Sun, Jul 30, 2023, 9:14 AM Pieter Kasselman wrote: > I support adoption. > > > > *From:* OAuth *On Behalf Of *Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > *Sent:* Saturday, July 29, 2023 8:27 PM > *To:* oauth > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-30 Thread Pieter Kasselman
I support adoption. From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 8:27 PM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication All, This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation-Based Client Authentication draft

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-30 Thread Oliver Terbu
I support adoption. On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 1:31 AM Wayne Chang wrote: > +1 > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 12:28 Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > wrote: > >> All, >> >> This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client >> Authentication *draft discussed in SF. >> >> https://datatracker.i

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread Wayne Chang
+1 On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 12:28 Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client > Authentication *draft discussed in SF. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/ > > Please, reply on the m

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread David Waite
I’m in favor of adoption. -DW > On Jul 29, 2023, at 1:27 PM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef > wrote: > > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation-Based Client > Authentication draft discussed in SF. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-based-client-

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread Kristina Yasuda
I support adoption. From: OAuth on behalf of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2023 12:27:14 PM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication All, This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread Leif Johansson
Support adoption > 29 juli 2023 kl. 12:28 skrev Rifaat Shekh-Yusef : > >  > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the Attestation-Based Client > Authentication draft discussed in SF. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/ > > Please

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread Brian Campbell
I am in favor of adoption. On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 1:27 PM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client > Authentication *draft discussed in SF. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/ >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread Michael Prorock
I support adoption Mike Prorock CTO - mesur.io On Sat, Jul 29, 2023, 12:28 Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client > Authentication *draft discussed in SF. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-ba

[OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - Attestation-Based Client Authentication

2023-07-29 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
All, This is an official call for adoption for the *Attestation-Based Client Authentication *draft discussed in SF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-looker-oauth-attestation-based-client-auth/ Please, reply on the mailing list and let us know if you are in favor of adopting this draft as WG