Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-02-04 Thread Roland Hedberg
Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:48 AM > To: oauth@ietf.org > Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open > Redirector > > Hi all, > > this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector, > see > https://tools.ietf.org/html/dra

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-02-03 Thread Mike Jones
I support adoption of this document by the working group. -- Mike -Original Message- From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 3:48 AM To: oauth@ietf.org Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-25 Thread George Fletcher
+1 On 1/25/16 1:41 PM, Phil Hunt wrote: Also, I would like to have a discussion in the WG around organization of the docs. What can we amend as errata (to give some of this stuff more prominence), and what new docs we should have? With PKCE, mix-up, and this, we may end up causing more confus

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-25 Thread Phil Hunt
+1. I agree with Nat’s comment re the title. Also, I would like to have a discussion in the WG around organization of the docs. What can we amend as errata (to give some of this stuff more prominence), and what new docs we should have? With PKCE, mix-up, and this, we may end up causing more c

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-21 Thread George Fletcher
+1 On 1/21/16 12:34 PM, Brian Campbell wrote: +1 On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:48 AM, John Bradley > wrote: Yes we did discuss changing the title as part of adopting it. On Jan 21, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Nat Sakimura mailto:sakim...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 apart

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-21 Thread Brian Campbell
+1 On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 7:48 AM, John Bradley wrote: > Yes we did discuss changing the title as part of adopting it. > > On Jan 21, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote: > > +1 apart from the title... It sounds like the spec is implementing OAuth > Open Redirector... > Something like "preve

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-21 Thread John Bradley
Yes we did discuss changing the title as part of adopting it. > On Jan 21, 2016, at 11:28 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote: > > +1 apart from the title... It sounds like the spec is implementing OAuth Open > Redirector... > Something like "preventing OAuth open redirector" or so might be more > descrip

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-21 Thread Nat Sakimura
+1 apart from the title... It sounds like the spec is implementing OAuth Open Redirector... Something like "preventing OAuth open redirector" or so might be more descriptive. Nat 2016年1月21日(木) 23:08 John Bradley : > +1 for adoption > > On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:18 AM, William Denniss wrote: > > +1

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-21 Thread John Bradley
+1 for adoption > On Jan 21, 2016, at 3:18 AM, William Denniss wrote: > > +1 for adoption. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Hannes Tschofenig > wrote: > Hi all, > > this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open > Redirector, see > https:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-20 Thread Antonio Sanso
+1 for adoption On Jan 19, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open > Redirector, see > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradley-oauth-open-redirector-02 > > Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / obj

[OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector

2016-01-19 Thread Hannes Tschofenig
Hi all, this is the call for adoption of OAuth 2.0 Security: OAuth Open Redirector, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bradley-oauth-open-redirector-02 Please let us know by Feb 2nd whether you accept / object to the adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working g