Am 01.04.20 um 16:13 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef:
> All,
>
> This concludes this call for adoption, and as per the
> feedback received, this document has been adopted as a WG document.
Thank you!
>
> *Authors,*
>
> Feel free to submit a new WG document.
And done :-)
-Daniel
__
All,
This concludes this call for adoption, and as per the feedback received,
this document has been adopted as a WG document.
*Authors,*
Feel free to submit a new WG document.
Regards,
Rifaat & Hannes
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 4:11 AM Steinar Noem wrote:
> +1
>
> tir. 17. mar. 2020 kl. 1
+1
tir. 17. mar. 2020 kl. 13:21 skrev Rifaat Shekh-Yusef :
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
> adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the
> Application Layer (DPoP)* document:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fett-
:* oauth
*Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: DPoP
All,
As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the
Application Layer (DPoP)* document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fett-oauth-dpop
o:* oauth
> *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: DPoP
>
>
>
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
> adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the
> Application Layer (DPoP)* document:
> https://datatrac
+1
I support adoption of DPoP. I have written an implementation of its current
state for a client and implemented its signature mechanism in another project
(without the rest of the protocol, fwiw).
Now, speaking as the editor of the group’s previous general-purpose http
signature draft (for
+1 to adopt DPoP
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:37 AM Filip Skokan wrote:
> I support the adoption of DPoP.
>
> Best,
> Filip
>
> 17. 3. 2020 v 13:21, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef :
>
>
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
> adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration
+1
On 3/17/2020 12:37 PM, Anthony Nadalin wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
> *From:* OAuth *On Behalf Of * Mike Jones
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:14 AM
> *To:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef ; oauth
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: DPoP
>
>
+1
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 8:14 AM
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef ; oauth
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: DPoP
I am for adoption of DPoP.
-- Mike
From: OAuth mailto:oauth-boun
I am for adoption of DPoP.
-- Mike
From: OAuth On Behalf Of Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2020 5:21 AM
To: oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Adoption: DPoP
All,
As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a
I support the adoption of DPoP.
--
-jim
Jim Willeke
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 8:21 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
> adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the
> Application Layer (DPoP)* doc
+1
———
Dominick Baier
On 17. March 2020 at 14:18:37, Torsten Lodderstedt (
torsten=40lodderstedt@dmarc.ietf.org) wrote:
+1
> On 17. Mar 2020, at 13:40, Vladimir Dzhuvinov
wrote:
>
> +1 for DPoP
>
> On 17/03/2020 14:25, Rob Otto wrote:
>> I support adoption
>>
>> Thank you
>> Rob Otto
>>
>>
+1
> On 17. Mar 2020, at 13:40, Vladimir Dzhuvinov wrote:
>
> +1 for DPoP
>
> On 17/03/2020 14:25, Rob Otto wrote:
>> I support adoption
>>
>> Thank you
>> Rob Otto
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 12:21, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
>> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meet
+1 for DPoP
On 17/03/2020 14:25, Rob Otto wrote:
> I support adoption
>
> Thank you
> Rob Otto
>
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 12:21, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
> mailto:rifaat.i...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call
> for adoption for
I support the adoption of DPoP.
Best,
Filip
> 17. 3. 2020 v 13:21, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef :
>
>
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for adoption
> for the OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the Application
> Layer (DPoP) document:
> https:
I support adoption
Thank you
Rob Otto
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 12:21, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
wrote:
> All,
>
> As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
> adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the
> Application Layer (DPoP)* document:
> https:/
All,
As per the conclusion of the PoP interim meeting, this is a call for
adoption for the *OAuth 2.0 Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession at the
Application Layer (DPoP)* document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-fett-oauth-dpop/
Please, let us know if you support or object to the adoptio
17 matches
Mail list logo
