t;> Google is already using some of these values. Microsoft is using some of
>>>>>> them. The OpenID MODRNA specs are using some of them. So it seems more
>>>>>> efficient to register them at the same time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> T
>>> That would be my preference.
>>>
>>
>> +1, it is also my preference to register the current values.
>>
>> I don't see any harm in the spec that establishes the registry also
>> seeding it with all known values in use at the time of drafting
g some of
>>>>>> them. The OpenID MODRNA specs are using some of them. So it seems more
>>>>>> efficient to register them at the same time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would be my preference.
>>>>>
>>>>> +1, it i
Phil Hunt
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc:
>>>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
>>>>> Adoption Finalized
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we just do that, then? Seems to be the easiest way to ad
ietf.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
>>> Adoption Finalized
>>>
>>> Can we just do that, then? Seems to be the easiest way to address various
>>> needs and concerns.
>>>
>>> — Justin
es.
>>>
>>> I don't see any harm in the spec that establishes the registry also seeding
>>> it with all known values in use at the time of drafting, regardless of the
>>> group that originally specified them. Makes the original spec more useful,
>&
I meant William - sorry!
Originalnachricht
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
Adoption Finalized
Von: Torsten Lodderstedt
An: William Denniss ,Mike Jones
Cc: ""
>Hi Denniss,
>
>out of curiosity: Does Google use
11:11 AM
To: Phil Hunt <mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com>
Cc: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values:
Call for Adoption Finalized
Can we just do that, then? Seems to be the easiest way to address
various needs and concern
Le dim. 14 févr. 2016 02:40, William Denniss a écrit :
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Mike Jones
> wrote:
>
>> It's an acceptable fallback option if the working group decides it
>> doesn't want to register the values that are already in production use at
>> the time we establish the registr
ld be my preference.
>
> -- Mike
> From: Justin Richer <mailto:jric...@mit.edu>
> Sent: 2/13/2016 11:11 AM
> To: Phil Hunt <mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com>
> Cc: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
&
h...@oracle.com>
Cc: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
Adoption Finalized
Can we just do that, then? Seems to be the easiest way to address various needs
and concerns.
— Justin
On Feb 13, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Phil Hunt (IDM)
mailto:
-- Mike
>>
>> <>
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org <mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org>]
>> On Behalf Of tors...@lodderstedt.net <mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, Fe
e
> of doing this.
>
>
>
> -- Mike
>
>
>
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> tors...@lodderstedt.net
> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 6:37 AM
> To: John Bradley
> Cc: oauth@ie
So basically, the RFC could also just establish the new registry and oidf could
feel in the values?
(just trying to understand)
Originalnachricht
Betreff: RE: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
Adoption Finalized
Von: Mike Jones
An: tors
uth in this spec.
>
> Right now, I think it creates the impression oauth is for authentication.
>
>
>
> Originalnachricht ----
> Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
> Adoption Finalized
> Von: John Bradley
> An: tors.
richt
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
Adoption Finalized
Von: John Bradley mailto:ve7...@ve7jtb.com>>
An: tors...@lodderstedt.net<mailto:tors...@lodderstedt.net>
Cc:
roland.hedb...@umu.se,oauth@ietf.org<mailto:roland.hedb...@umu.se,oauth@ietf
est regards,
>> Torsten.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- Ursprüngliche Nachricht
>> Von: Roland Hedberg
>> Gesendet: Friday, February 12, 2016 05:45 PM
>> An: oauth@ietf.org
>> Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values:
rds,
> Torsten.
>
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Roland Hedberg
> Gesendet: Friday, February 12, 2016 05:45 PM
> An: oauth@ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
> Adoption Finalized
>
> +1
, February 12, 2016 05:45 PM
An: oauth@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for
Adoption Finalized
>+1
>
>> 12 feb 2016 kl. 16:58 skrev John Bradley :
>>
>> +1 to adopt this draft.
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2016, at 3:07 AM
-- Mike
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:23 AM
>> To: oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method
-- Mike
> <>
> -Original Message-
> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:23 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for Adoption
> Finalized
@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 11:23 AM
> To: oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for Adoption
> Finalized
>
> Hi all,
>
> On January 19th I posted a call for adoption of the Aut
February 4, 2016 11:23 AM
To: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Authentication Method Reference Values: Call for Adoption
Finalized
Hi all,
On January 19th I posted a call for adoption of the Authentication Method
Reference Values specification, see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oa
Hi all,
On January 19th I posted a call for adoption of the Authentication
Method Reference Values specification, see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15402.html
What surprised us is that this work is conceptually very simple: we
define new claims and create a registry with n
24 matches
Mail list logo
