To: oauth
> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] About JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access
> Tokens
>
> Hi,
> By reading this draft
> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-05) I got
> the
> impression that it implies using JWTs as bearer tokens, e.
oauth
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] About JSON Web Token (JWT) Profile for OAuth 2.0 Access
Tokens
Hi,
By reading this draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-05) I got the
impression that it implies using JWTs as bearer tokens, e.g., it does
consider any of the semantics defin
Hi,
By reading this draft
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-05) I got the
impression that it implies using JWTs as bearer tokens, e.g., it does consider
any of the semantics defined in RFC7800. Is this correct? If yes what was the
rational behind this design choice?
