Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management

2015-03-02 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hi, I'd like to see if we can get last call started on this one soon. My questions are not all specific to this draft and I won't hold up this draft for answers that are broader. For this one, if the duplicate TLS text can be addressed, that would be helpful. Then, I'll also need to know more o

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management

2015-02-26 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hi Justin, Thanks for the quick response. On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Justin Richer wrote: > On Feb 26, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Kathleen Moriarty < > kathleen.moriarty.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > I reviewed draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management, which reads well and I > just have a f

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management

2015-02-26 Thread Justin Richer
On Feb 26, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > > Hello, > > I reviewed draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management, which reads well and I just > have a few questions and suggestions below that would be good to address > prior to IETF last call. > > Section 1.3 > Bullet D might be easier t

[OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management

2015-02-26 Thread Kathleen Moriarty
Hello, I reviewed draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management, which reads well and I just have a few questions and suggestions below that would be good to address prior to IETF last call. Section 1.3 Bullet D might be easier to read as a list within the bullet. Section 2 This is something I don't recal