Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp

2018-12-21 Thread Eric Rescorla
th *On Behalf Of * Eric Rescorla > *Sent:* Monday, August 27, 2018 4:03 AM > *To:* oauth > *Subject:* [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp > > > > Rich version of this review at: > https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D4649 > > > COMMEN

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp

2018-11-09 Thread Mike Jones
Thanks again for the review, Eric. The resolutions published in https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-04 are as follows... From: OAuth On Behalf Of Eric Rescorla Sent: Monday, August 27, 2018 4:03 AM To: oauth Subject: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp Rich

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp

2018-11-05 Thread Mike Jones
: [OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp Rich version of this review at: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D4649 COMMENTS S 1.2. > 1.2. Conventions used in this document > > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL

[OAUTH-WG] AD Review of draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp

2018-08-26 Thread Eric Rescorla
Rich version of this review at: https://mozphab-ietf.devsvcdev.mozaws.net/D4649 COMMENTS S 1.2. > 1.2. Conventions used in this document > > The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", > "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and >