Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-27 Thread Brian Campbell
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 5:48 PM Aaron Parecki wrote: > Thanks for the detailed review Brian! I've made many of these edits to the > draft, but there are still a few things that need some discussion on the > list. My notes are inline below. > Thanks Aaron. I realize there was a lot there. I've fo

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-24 Thread Aaron Parecki
Thanks for the detailed review Brian! I've made many of these edits to the draft, but there are still a few things that need some discussion on the list. My notes are inline below. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > Been working on this on and off for a while now (it's not

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-24 Thread Brian Campbell
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:36 PM Dick Hardt wrote: > Brian: many, many thanks for all the feedback! > You are welcome. I won't lie - it was not a quick exercise :) > > I did a quick skim of your comments, and will address the first and last > ones. > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Brian Camp

Re: [OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-22 Thread Dick Hardt
Brian: many, many thanks for all the feedback! I did a quick skim of your comments, and will address the first and last ones. On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 3:49 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > Been working on this on and off for a while now (it's not exactly short at > 80+ pages, various other priorities,

[OAUTH-WG] A token review of draft-parecki-oauth-v2-1-01

2020-04-21 Thread Brian Campbell
Been working on this on and off for a while now (it's not exactly short at 80+ pages, various other priorities, etc.) but wanted to share my thoughts from an initial review of the OAuth 2.1 draft before the interim next week where it is on the agenda https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-interim-