ment.
>>> / Erik
>>>
>>>
>>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 19:18, Justin Richer wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree with added "For example" in a few places. It's not normative it's
>>> informational here.
>>>
>>&g
uot; in a few places. It's not normative it's
>> informational here.
>>
>>
>>
>> < div="">
>> -- Justin
>>
>> / Sent from my phone /
>> <>
>>
>>
>> Original message
>> Fro
;
> -- Justin
>
> / Sent from my phone /
> <>
>
>
> Original message --------
> From: Phil Hunt
> Date: 11/19/2015 11:28 AM (GMT-06:00)
> To: Erik Wahlström neXus
> Cc: "" , Justin Richer
>
> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] A review of draft
uth@ietf.org>>"
mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>, Justin Richer
mailto:i...@justin.richer.org>>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] A review of draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture-05
I think your point that maybe the architecture doc be generic enough to support
both json and cbor tokens is worth consideration.
, Justin Richer
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] A review of draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture-05
I think your point that maybe the architecture doc be generic enough to support
both json and cbor tokens is worth consideration.
I am just not sure of process and consensus now that we are past WGLC. Wou
I think your point that maybe the architecture doc be generic enough to support
both json and cbor tokens is worth consideration.
I am just not sure of process and consensus now that we are past WGLC. Would
the cose group prefer this?
Happy to do it if desired. Also understand if we are too fa
Just a note then. I did not see anything that prohibited the usage of pop
tokens for IoT so shipping it as is works.
Sent from my iPhone
On 19 Nov 2015, at 17:18, Phil Hunt
mailto:phil.h...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On the subject of making the spec(s) less JWT specific, it was a foundational
assu
On the subject of making the spec(s) less JWT specific, it was a foundational
assumption and (I think) in the charter. However COSE wasn't around yet.
I suppose the more generic architecture doc could be altered to cover IoT
cases, but it may be problematic for the other specs that are more spe
Hi,
I have been reviewing draft-ietf-oauth-pop-architecture-05. In ACE WG we have a
draft that uses PoP tokens for IoT and the architectures defined here so my
review was done with that IoT perspective. I’m a bit late with the review and
some of the comments might already be mentioned by others
