Blaine,
Your issues were not ignored, but I do not think there was consensus one
way or the other on them. Your points were:
1) Recommendation to use JSON only
2) A question about what the JSON format would look like
3) Direct vs. indirect queries (i.e., whether to use resource parameter)
I
I disagree that the current spec is a good starting point - the issues I've
raised have been ignored, and the spec is now much more complicated from
both sides of the implementation fence.
On May 7, 2012 3:17 PM, "Paul E. Jones" wrote:
> Walter,
>
> I'm not sure what the full set of issues will
Walter,
I'm not sure what the full set of issues will be, but I only have a
couple of small edits queued for -05 at present (one being "template"
should be "href" in the example at the end of 4.2 that you pointed out
to me privately). We've already worked through a number of issues to
get to
