[OAUTH-WG] Re: WGLC for SD-JWT

2024-09-05 Thread Judith Kahrer
I gave the -12 revision a read. Thanks for the great work Brian, Kristina and Dr. Fett. One thing that I find confusing is the term “Issuer-signed JWT”. Isn’t it self-evident that a signed JWT is signed by its Issuer (that is its creator as defined in the spec)? I think, the spec would read jus

[OAUTH-WG] Re: WGLC for SD-JWT

2024-09-05 Thread Judith Kahrer
I agree, I also think the intro is hard to read. There are some more points that I want to add with regard to the introduction: > The JSON-based representation of claims in a signed JWT is secured against > modification using JWS digital signatures. A consumer of a signed JWT that > has checke

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Evaluation of Scope Management in Refresh Token Behavior

2024-02-21 Thread Judith Kahrer
you to better understand scope management. This mailing list is not an appropriate place to discuss vendor specifics, so if you want to provide feedback regarding our docs or product, feel free to reach out. I will be happy to answer or forward your questions. Judith Kahrer Product Marketing Eng

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Evaluation of Scope Management in Refresh Token Behavior

2024-02-20 Thread Judith Kahrer
part of the refresh token (anymore). Instead, maintain the original scope list in the new refresh token. Best regards, Judith Kahrer E: judith.kah...@curity.io W: curity.io > On 20 Feb 2024, at 07:35, Sachin Mamoru wrote: > > Hi All, > > When we request an access token using 3