Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?

2010-07-15 Thread Ivan Pulleyn
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt < tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > As I have written in my reply to Marius's posting. I'm fine with including > server ids in scopes. But this requires a definition of the scope's syntax > and semantics in the spec. Otherwise, scope interpret

Re: [OAUTH-WG] resource server id needed?

2010-07-14 Thread Ivan Pulleyn
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Torsten Lodderstedt < tors...@lodderstedt.net> wrote: > Did I get you right? Your answer is: Oauth is not suited for deployments > with different resource servers which rely in a single authz server? > > I don't know why you categorize this as "complex". Is it so